Editorial practices

All content gathering for Arquidyne Haus is conducted in full compliance with applicable Australian Law and international copyright regulations. Our team respects property rights, individual privacy, and intellectual property, ensuring that all activities related to information collection are lawful and transparent. We do not condone or tolerate any activity that could be construed as trespass or otherwise unlawful conduct in the pursuit of architectural stories or imagery.

Originality and proper credit are core values. Every article, project review, and visual element must originate from our team, freelance contributors, or be shared with explicit permission. When referencing external sources, we provide clear and accurate attribution. Direct quotations or data from other publications are always credited and, where appropriate, clearly marked as quotations. Plagiarism in any form—textual, visual, or conceptual—is strictly prohibited.

Architectural reporting must be based on verifiable information. Our editors and contributors diligently check facts, data points, and project details before publication. Where uncertainty exists regarding a claim or technical specification, we consult with reliable sources, industry professionals, or the relevant parties to ensure accuracy. Contributions undergo reviews by subject-matter editors prior to online publication.

We acknowledge that mistakes can occur. When factual inaccuracies or misleading statements are discovered, we promptly publish corrections, clarifications, or retractions where necessary. Corrections are issued following an internal review involving senior editors, and readers are informed transparently of substantive changes. We aim to rectify errors as quickly as possible while maintaining careful editorial oversight.

Our core editorial team is comprised of experienced writers, researchers, and industry practitioners. We also welcome knowledgeable volunteer contributors from the architectural community to enrich our platform with fresh insights, technical analyses, and regional viewpoints.

We value engagement from our readers and industry peers. Story suggestions, trends, or noteworthy developments submitted to our editorial team are carefully assessed against our content guidelines. Editors evaluate all tips for relevance, newsworthiness, and alignment with our mission before allocating them for further investigation or coverage.

Arquidyne Haus recognises the value of reader participation. We accept original manuscript submissions, opinion pieces, and photographic essays from our audience, subject to editorial review. Our editorial panel reviews all submissions for originality, integrity, and alignment with our mission. Accepted submissions may be subject to editing for clarity, style and factual accuracy. Accepted works are edited in collaboration with the contributor before publication.

Clear guidance on formatting and topic suitability is provided on our Submission page. Work published in the journal remains the property of the original author, but must not have appeared elsewhere unless clearly disclosed.

We occasionally publish sponsored content, which is always fully disclosed and labelled as such. Sponsored articles are held to the same editorial standards as all other content, including clear distinction from independent journalism, transparency about sponsorship, and fact-checking. Editorial decisions concerning sponsored content are made independently, and sponsors do not influence our main editorial agenda.